Expectations and preferences
Do you want a response? Do you expect one? Does it make a difference whether we're talking about fic, meta, lulz, or just general posts? What seems polite to you? What is the prevailing way that Things Are Done?
When I comment on fic
I expect a response from the author.
29 (20.1%)
I don't expect a response from the author.
18 (12.5%)
I have no expectation.
63 (43.8%)
I would prefer a response.
84 (58.3%)
I would prefer not to get a response.
6 (4.2%)
I have no preference.
29 (20.1%)
When I comment on a meta post
I expect a response from the author.
42 (29.8%)
I don't expect a response from the author.
8 (5.7%)
I have no expectation.
55 (39.0%)
I would prefer a response.
94 (66.7%)
I would prefer not to get a response.
2 (1.4%)
I have no preference.
16 (11.3%)
When I comment on a personal entry
I expect a response from the author.
54 (38.3%)
I don't expect a response from the author.
7 (5.0%)
I have no expectation.
52 (36.9%)
I would prefer a response.
75 (53.2%)
I would prefer not to get a response.
0 (0.0%)
I have no preference.
24 (17.0%)
When I comment on a lulzy post
I expect a response from the author.
13 (9.4%)
I don't expect a response from the author.
28 (20.3%)
I have no expectation.
72 (52.2%)
I would prefer a response.
37 (26.8%)
I would prefer not to get a response.
1 (0.7%)
I have no preference.
54 (39.1%)
no subject
no subject
Yeah, pretty much this.
no subject
(The other thing is that if the OP is responding to everyone *else*, I am sad if said OP only ignores *me* (or me and a few others.) But I think that's a given for nearly everyone.)
no subject
no subject
If a meta is a fully conceived essay and all i say is Wow, i agree. thank you, I don't expect a response. But most journal entries are opening up discussion and when i engage there i expect a response, because I'm entering a conversation.
no subject
And I think also, because when you comment on a post, one person is getting your comment whereas when you comment on a comment at least two probably read you. finally, I think kanata's comment offers the very engagement he talks about (while I wasn't fully sure with schmevil, because a poll may want to engage or not)
all that being said, schmevil, cool poll :)
no subject
That's a good point though, polls can be tricky to gauge. It's hard to tell what kind of response the poll author is looking for. Do they just want it filled out? Do they expect substantial meta in the comments? The poll itself gives you the option of engaging or not - it's not the opening gambit in a meta conversation. Although it could be, depending on how people respond.
no subject
That's a cardinal sin? I had no idea -- I always kinda like it when I see people replying to other folks instead of directly to me, when I'm the OP. I mean, if they reply to me, that's fine, but I always feel like I must be doing something right if people feel like it's okay to reply to each other, instead of all having one-on-one conversations with only me.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(And I wouldn't expect a response to something like this, OP!)
no subject
no subject
This, pretty much.
no subject
That's not to say I'll stop reading good stories if they authors never acknowledge comments, but I'm certainly less likely to *leave* them if the authors consistently *don't* respond in some way, however minimal.
The whole thing about having comments (for me) is so that people can communicate. If they don't want to talk, they can post with the comments disabled.
no subject
I have more expectations when it comes to meta, or strangely, lulzy posts where I've made a (obviously hilarious!) joke.
fandom is pretty much give and take
Re: fandom is pretty much give and take
I agree though, for meta posts, I'm more likely to expect a response of some kind. I like how Kanata put it - you're trying to engage in conversation, not just commenting on something complete and fully under the author's control. A response just makes sense.
Although I totally fail in this arena too, sometimes. ;)
Re: fandom is pretty much give and take
via metafandom
That said, I'm not too concerned when that reply comes, especially on meta posts, where thoughts can be long and meaty, and it might take a while to formulate a reply. But when I'm reading fic, for example, and I find one that's more than a week old or so and I see that the author hasn't replied to any comments? I won't waste my time commenting, then, if it appears the author doesn't care.
Re: via metafandom
I'd glad to hear that the time factor isn't an issue for you. I'm always worried that I'm responding too slowly to comments and putting people off. Sometimes (for a variety of reasons) I can't respond to comments for days. I always battle the feeling that my lack of promptness has branded me a jerk.
no subject
For comments on fic, if the writer gets a lot of comments or the story has been up for a long time, I assume they're overwhelmed or have a lot of irons in the fire and can't reply to everyone personally. They wrote a fic, I said it was good and the circle
of lifeis complete.Of course, it's always NICE to get a reply and 9t feels good to be acknowledged, but I'm not wounded if it doesn't happen.
no subject
no subject
I hope that made some kind of sense.
no subject
no subject
here via metafandom
Re: here via metafandom
no subject
roughly around 80% of comments I make to fics/art are "I liked this" or "this is awesome/great/cool" or "great job"
in those cases, I never expect replies from authors/artists, its just a nice to have, if they reply.
on the other hand, if I gave a more detailed response, I expect an equal lengthy reply.
If someone does not reply to my lengthier comments, or if they just reply with "thanks" to those five or more sentences or more that I made, next time, I will just say "this is great".
quid pro quo.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
In addition to that, I'm one of those people who goes "ooh, new messages!" when they open their inboxes, and when one of those messages is just a "thank you" from an author I didn't even remember I've commented to, I feel a tiny bit disappointed. And that's what shifts the balance towards 'I would prefer not to receive a response'. The real answer would be 'I would prefer to receive a response with some semblance of substance, or no response at all'.
Other than that, I agree with the above commenters about expecting a response only when you're trying to engage the OP in a conversation. If someone posts a picture of a random cat and I go, "Ooh, cute!", I really don't expect that person to say something back.
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's a bit like wanting your favourite foods for dinner every night, but not remotely expecting it and it'd probably be bad for me anyway ;).
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Oh, and total icon!love!
no subject
no subject
That might just be my ego speaking though. :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
With other stuff, it really depends on the person, and the mood of the post. Again, if they're not the sort of people who reply to everything, then I don't really expect a response, especially if we're not super close. Otherwise, I might.
But if I expect a response, that doesn't mean I think I'm entitled to one. I don't get too bent out of shape over it. :)
no subject