ext_6785 ([identity profile] schmevil.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] schmevil 2003-08-25 03:15 pm (UTC)

Arg. I can't read it because I'm work, so I'll have to get back to you on that.

I like your definition of meta and I think I might adopt some of your terms to explain it in future. You analogy is clear and a damn sight more logical than many literary definitions I've seen, but it still manages to dovetail with those.


Because literary interpretation is so vague and so subjective, you could make a case for every fic being a metafic.

*nods* Which is why, like you, I'm more interested in a stricter defintion. Something so open as this, renders the notion of meta useless as a tool for analysis and discussion.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org