schmevil: (Default)
I found some old fic that I forgot to archive at [livejournal.com profile] martianhouse, and some things that I never got around to posting at all. Here now, for your reading pleasure:

These two are from my 'OMG guys, you know what's funny? Death Eaters!' phase.

Happy F***ing Christmas
Fandom: Harry Potter
Summary: The Death Eaters take issue with holiday cheer, and have a jolly good time of it.
Character(s): Bellatrix/Rudolpho Lestrange, the Bones'
Word Count: 968
Warnings: torture
Notes: Companion to Flammiferum Acanthus (The Flaming Christmas Tree). (Written pre OotP).

Fire
Fandom: Harry Potter
Summary: The Ministry is hell!
Character(s): Snape, Wilkes, Rosier
Word Count: 883
Notes: Companion to Flammiferum Acanthus (The Flaming Christmas Tree). (Written pre OotP).

From back when there were two Blaise mysteries: is Blaise a boy or a girl, and who the hell is that Blaise guy?

The Great Blaise Mystery
Fandom: Harry Potter
Summary: See title.
Character(s): Blaise
Word Count: 146

Bootstrap
Fandom: Pirates of the Caribbean
Summary: Bootstrap gets bootstrapped, right over the side of the Black Pearl.
Character(s): Bill Turner
Word Count: 469
Notes: Pre Dead Man's Chest

Oral Fixation
Fandom: Smallville
Summary: Lex has one.
Character(s): Lex, Clark
Word Count: 100

Chimera
Title: Chimera
Fandom: Smallville
Summary: Lex is a meteor mutant. His body adapts. (Also, there's aliens).
Character(s):
Word Count: 1727
Notes: Companion piece to Humming

Humming
Fandom: Smallville
Summary: When they’ve tried and tried, and all failed, then they will need him. (Lex waits for rescue).
Character(s): Lex
Word Count: 1084
Notes: Companion piece to Chimera.

Lana CSI?

May. 25th, 2008 07:50 pm
schmevil: (lana)
[Poll #1193753]

Investigator because she's stubborn and curious.

Coroner because she's interested in the dead.

Discuss.
schmevil: (narcissa)
So I decided to post some of my old unfinished fic, including baby's first fanfic.

Yeah. It's pretty bad. Like most people, when I wrote my first fic I didn't think I needed a beta reader, or to obey the laws of grammar, spelling, good taste or physics. I was also basically writing fanfic of fanfic - commenting on stuff that other people were putting out at the time and not nearly so much on the source text. The story in question actually has some tenuous links to Harry Potter but reading it now, it's obviously so much more about Snape and Slytherin-centric fic circa Goblet of Fire.

Snape is sexed up and there's a creepy teacher-student relationship developing, though in this case, Snape is the student. My intention was to make the relationship (never to be consumated) part cute, part creepy. There's a lot of sex going on in this story, but not much of it happens on screen. It seemed to be the thing back then to have Slytherin be a den of iniquity - is this still popular in fic? I don't read much fic anymore, much less HP fic.

The Slytherin kids are reeeally concerned with their reputations. They're massively pretentious, though they don't really know what they're talking about - randomly name-dropping artists and writers and getting it wrong. The writer also got it wrong a lot of the time. ;-)

Anyway, for your reading displeasure: Arithmancy and Flowers.

And from a year or so later, two other never finished fics.

Title: Kidnapped
Fandom: Smallville
Characters: Jonathan, Martha, Nell, Lex
Summary: When young Alexander Luthor is kidnapped, it's up to FBI agent Jonathan Kent to find him before it's too late.

Title: Holes - Discourse
Fandom: Harry Potter
Summary: The consequences of changing sides.
Characters: Draco, Bellatrix

Freedom

May. 8th, 2004 10:02 pm
schmevil: (Shipper (B/S by MissModdy))
A friend came out to his best friend today, and the (happy) fallout of that took up several hours of my day. I'm so proud! He was shaky and scared, though his friend's reaction was positive. I've yet to get to a place where I'm entirely comfortable, so I understand - even the slightest hint of disapproval can send you into internal hysterics. We talked about school, and how it gives us a false sense of security that sets us up for one rude awakening after another. How many times can you get your hopes of Everything Being Ok, dashed, before you stop getting them up? We've made a shopping-and-lattes date for Monday.

I haven't seen much of any of my friends, as I've been working forty-four hours a week, and starting at six thirty AM, besides. While it's nice to end your work day at two in the afternoon, it does set you at odds with everyone else. Curses. I need a second job.

***

I FINISHED MY REMIX! Actually, days ago, but as I haven't posted in ages, I'm just spreading the happy news now. I scorn [livejournal.com profile] emelerin and everyone else who's still working on their remixes. Losers. Wankers. Layabouts. *scoffityscoff*

The remix came close to killing me, but I've had more fun working on it than I have on anything else in... a scarily long time. Clearly I need a new Problem Fic to occupy my attention. Usually challenges do nothing for me, but the unique challenge that the remix represented, really piqued my interest. I'd rather like to remix other stories. *leers at flist*

Speaking of fic, I spent the afternoon spamming Skyehawke. [livejournal.com profile] emelerin was kind enough to offer invites to her flist, and I was bored enough to take her up on it. After uploading a good portion of my completed fic, I've realized something: clearly I don't write enough. I like the posting and editing interface - it's easy to use and not noticeably buggy. The search function is shite, but the site is still small enough for that not to matter. If anyone would like an invite, reply to this post.

Without the remix hanging over my head, I've no idea what to do with my alloted fandom time. I'm too busy, generally, to become involved with fora or archives, but I'm already bored. And none of my (manymanymany) WIPs are really grabbing me. Arithmancy and Flowers (the fic which would not die) is of course still there, like a cracked out, overweight, old gnat. Buzzing. But I need something new. Something to get passionate about. Perhaps even a new fandom. Ho hum.

***

I've been bad about actually sitting down and watching my shows, of late. However. Today I watched a stack of Smallville tapes. And laughed. Then laughed more.

Young!Lex is a seriously, hardcore laugh-riot.

Everyone of the many times his wee, round face would scrunch up and he'd bawl, I died. This entry is being written by zombie!MHC. I died. Horrible acting, right down there with Lucas.

Is it wrong that I also snickered at Lionel's epiphany and screamed SUCKAH at the screen?

Randomly, Lex is a Gryffindor. There's nothing for it. My love was shaking, during the Belle Reve storyline, but it's been renewed.

And what can I say about Chloe in "Truth", except: ha! (Krabapple styles)

***

Snapeboy update:

[livejournal.com profile] icarusancalion you'll be pleased to learn that he hates the Velvet Underground and thinks there's nothing better for a night of drinking, than the Sex Pistols. He admired my Ramones t-shirt as well. My hopes are high.
schmevil: (Come on you know you want to)
... and thus we present [livejournal.com profile] 3wordficreviews. Come play in our new sandbox. Come on, you know you want to.


Happy birthday [livejournal.com profile] cedarlibrarian. Pamper yourself, dammit. Because your status partner says so.


Randomly, did you know there's a Cthullu plushie puppet? And a Summer Fun Cthullu plushie? And a Halloween Cthullu plushie?


Re Smallville - Velocity: I've watched the scene millions of times and there is NO reason for the car to crash and explode in that way. None. It's utterly and completely insane. Much like... the show in general. Also, the Oasis - Wonderwall cover in the credits? Horrible. *stabs* It's all about the Cat Power version.


Thank you drive through.
schmevil: (Schmevil AND grouchy)
[livejournal.com profile] musesfool puts the Lupin=James theory to death with this cute fic.

[livejournal.com profile] childfree brings us yet another bizarre baby-related story: "Man Throws Glass of Water at Baby"

I'm not the only one! [livejournal.com profile] mecurtin sees the Jesus!Lex imagery too. Proof that I wasn't totally cracked for writing Transom? Probably not. An interesting analysis? Damn straight. *still craves proof of sanity*

[livejournal.com profile] crackernuts compares animagery to shapeshifting but doesn't come up with anything conclusive. How does the transformation work?

[livejournal.com profile] malecrit thinks people need to stop messing with Draco and just write Lockhart. H/L 4 eva!!1 Harhart?

[livejournal.com profile] icarusancalion teaches us the basics of battle scenes.

[livejournal.com profile] lavenderoracle had a birthday. *kiss*
schmevil: (Not so bright)
1. I haven't been able to sign into my yahoo account in days, so if anyone's sent me a message and I haven't responded, I do apologize, but you can reach me at mhc_black at myway.com.

2. My HD ate Arithmancy and Flowers. [livejournal.com profile] icarusancalion was able to provide me a copy up to the "Fools and Gryffindors" interlude but there are several chapters after that. Does anyone know of a full copy floating around? I do have parts of the later chapters and interludes on hand, but not the full text.

3. Anyone interested in co-writing a Smallville fic with me? I'd like to try co-writing, as an exercise, if nothing else, and I have a number of ideas that I'm getting nowhere with on my own. *wheedles*

4. What do you think of story notes? If I were to write about my own stories - why I chose to explore certain themes, employed particular devices, characterized thusly - would you be interested? Would you in turn write about your stories in the same way?
schmevil: (Fuck off!)
Men do not fall in love with whores because of the sex. They fall in love with women who happen to be whores, and they fall in love with the idea of whores. They DO NOT fall in love with whores because of the sex. Men who frequent whores are looking for commitment-free sexual gratification. Most require nothing more than a warm, willing body and occasionally a sympathetic ear. Of course there are niches for whores who specialize in various kinds of kinkplay, or offer companionship in addition to sex, but those are niches, with very few people working them.

Most whores don't have a good home they could go home to, nor do they have ready alternatives to an industry which is ultimately degrading, debilitating and extremely unhealthy. It's not now, nor has it ever been a romantic occupation. Whores work until they die, too young, looking old.

I'm really tired of whorefic. Especially slash whorefic. See, I get that it's escapism, really I do. I'm writing about children's books and mediocre television shows too - I get escapism. However, there are very few writers who take hold of the idea and can own it in a reasonable way. Even in escapist fiction, reason is important because it's essential to the dramatic integrity of the story. If, as a writer, you can't establish the settup in a reasonable way, you need to take a harsh look at your skills.

There are about a million slashy whorefics in which our male hero runs away for some suitably suburban-angsty reason and turns to tricking. There are about ten slashy whorefics that do this in a way which is not laughable. The thing that most of us seem to forget is that um, most straight guys would not leap to trickng as way of earning their daily bread. It's just not something that would enter their head because straight boys tend not to have learned to use their sexuality in the same ways that girls and some homosexual boys do. As a straight boy, their sexuality is tied up in getting girls. Not in being had. So right from the get go, writing a slashy whorefic is many times more difficult than a het fic. It only gets worse from there.

Obstacle the second? How does a kid like Harry or Clark even find work in the sex industry, let alone become a leather and silk-wearing sex god? It's not like you can just walk down some random street, show some skin, pick up a John and *BANG* you're superwhore. Like any industry, you have to learn the market. What sex acts cost how much and what are appropriate markups during the holidays. Then there are concerns particular to the sex industry - what protection is necessary for what sex acts, how do you ensure your safety, where are all the free clinics and who are the cops who go easy on whores? How do you live through the next day?

I mean, fuck. Why not go wait tables, sell drugs, roll old women for their purses? How does a kid like Harry or Clark come to the conclusion that sucking cock for lunch is a good idea when there are so many alternatives, even for a runaway?

Harry is a relatively intelligent kid, who's shown flashes of ruthlessness and cunning. He's never been comfortable living with the Dursleys and has actively fought back with the meager weapons at his disposal. He's magically powerful and resourceful.

Clark has superpowers. Super. Powers.

Just about every other male hero out there has something to fall back on, even if it's only enough arrogance to ensure that they'd rather snatch purses than get on their knees for a paunchy, middle-aged man, sweating through his cheap suit and grunting as he comes.

Fast forward. We're now at the part where the John falls in love with the whore. Snape and Harry, or Lex and Clark have been fucking regularly, and perhaps even have a live-in arrangement. Snape/Lex is so very smitten with Harry/Clark's cock-sucking skills that he bathes the boy, clothes him, angsts over him and eventually takes him away from it all.

What the hell kind of moron falls in love with an untrustworthy, dirty, street urchin, with big eyes and a bigger mouth, simply after coming really hard? I mean, great sex is great sex, but it sure isn't worth house-training a street whore over. There's a reason that rich men who want live-in lovers prefer expensive callgirls/boys. They're clean! Neither of these characters are complete fools and there is no reason to suspect that they'd be so gulible as to wear their wallets on their sleeves.

Even if - and this is a big if - the couples got to the point where actual pleasantries were exchanged, and they began to view each other as people and not sexual organs on legs, both of them would have to be seriously emotionally troubled to put themselves at risk by caring for a john or a whore. Both are at risk of losing money. Both are at risk of losing their lives. It's in no ones best interest for it to become emotional or personal.

The thing about Pretty Woman, the thing that made it so charming, is that it's an impossible love story that works because the Richard Gere and Julia Roberts characters sparkle together and are both fundamentally honest and likeable. There is almost a purity to the relationship, entirely dependent on how little they know of each other, and how very much they're risking. That they're willing to take the risk, hell, that they're even capable of it, is astonishing. Most people could never inhabit those roles. Harry and Clark couldn't. Snape and Lex most definitely couldn't.

To suggest otherwise is, in 99% of cases, Teh Dumb.

Thank you, drive through.
schmevil: (I shall enable!)
So [livejournal.com profile] fizzingpop and I were talking about how we think Smallville will turn out in the end. I said I'd put all my money on Chloe dying nobly. She said that Chloe's going to get her own show. Chloe Chronicles anyone?

[Poll #200064]
schmevil: (puppet posse)
Lana has always had special knowledge of Lex. She has seen him - knows him - in a way that none of the other teenagers can. Their first onscreen interactions are shadowed by that earlier encounter, the sexual nature of which informs their relationship. Lana sees Lex as a sexual being, before anything else. Likewise, Lex learns of Lana as an object of male desire, before anything else. When they finally exchange words, they're already sexually aware of each other. I don't think it's a coincidence that Kreuk's performance is often more sexually charged when she is working with Rosenbaum, even when the script doesn't explicitly call for it. The nature of their relationship, at it's most basic does. Their relationship is sexually charge in a way that none of the others on the show really is - awareness without desire; awareness with affinity.

Someone said a while back that the conflation of symbolic Lex and Lana moments acts to queer or feminize Lex, but I would argue that as much as it queers Lex, it does the same for Lana. It does nothing more than draw the two characters together, sexually, morally, iconically and psychologically. Every time the writers contrast the characters, they validate a comparison - they underline the similarities, simply through the effort it takes to point out their differences. Alternately, look at how easily the space between Chloe and Lana is demarcated by the dialogue, script, performances and the mythologies informing the two - there's an obvious and natural gap between them, evident in everything from the way they talk and dress, to the way they act and think. Lana and Chloe occupy very different spaces. Lana and Lex occupy similar spaces.

Both had sheltered childhoods marked by tragedy and scandal. Both are extremely passionate but have been educated to control - supress - that passion. Strong emotion is generally a source or sign of danger for both of them. Romantic attachments tend not to work out very well, and friendships are complicated by envy, deception and a certain lack of understanding. Both are driven by fear and a profound need to impose control, and are limited by their social positions. Both have a profound need to know. More than Chloe's quest for the truth, Lex and Lana need simply know and see everything and everyone around them, to feel safe. Both want to be saved, but doubt they can be. Both are beginning to see Clark's limitations as a hero, and learning that ultimately they only have themselves to rely on. Both are resisting this knowledge.

Circa Zero, Lana is hesitent about trusting Lex. "How much do we know about him?" But she overcomes this easily enough - it never becomes a major factor in their relationship. She forgives 'betrayals' easily and their relationship always seems to return quickly to its starting point: Lex challenging Lana, Lana fighting back. When the Talon is in trouble and Lex suggests playing dirty, Lana does it. She just does it. It's only after that she expresses doubt to Clark. She's not sure she's done the right thing, and she won't do it again. But she does. If Lex suggests Lana take a morally questionable route to her goals, she'll take it. By the third season, she's initiating the transgression.

Both Lex and Lana turn to Clark for moral guidance and their transgressions are positioned as being against Clark, just as they are against Clark's morality. In Perry, Lana turns to Lex for help, because Clark is 'with him'. With Perry White, who forces her to remember the death of her parents, just as she was finally starting to put it behind her, with Clark as the new center of her life. Lana has a very particular picture of who she wants to be and Perry is in her way. She doesn't treat Perry as a human, he's an obstacle to bypassed, an insect to swat. Similarly, Lex, who desperately wants to convince himself that his father is worth caring for and that Lex himself is not a potential patricide, simply pushes Perry out of town.

Perry threatens Lex and Lana's construction of their identities. Clark's connection to Perry makes Clark too, a threat. Perry represents the truth abused. Lex and Lana abuse the truth further, without thought. They will be what they believe themselves to be, what they want to be and what they believe they want themselves to be, no matter the moral cost. Clark's connection to Perry is a betrayal that had potentially explosive consequences - only his get out of jail free card, in the form of his obligation to Perry, mitigated the betrayal for Lex and Lana. There was, however, still a sense that despite the obligation, Clark should have told Perry to shove off, or possibly help the two of them get rid of him. Clark should aid in their self-deception and self-construction. Clark is good when he does this, and when he protects them. When Clark challenges them, Clark is a son of a bitch.

Lex and Lana both want to have the kind of morals that Clark espouses, but they're more inclined to see the world in terms of threats to be eliminated. They constantly seek protection, try to ingratiate themselves to everyone around them, make themselves indispensible and are always ready to do whatever it takes to keep their worlds safe. Whatever is dear to them must be protected at all costs.

Like Clark's connection to Perry, his connection to Chloe is potentially a threat to them both. Not only because she takes Clark away from them both, in terms of time, but because she takes Clark away from them in terms of morality. She reminds Clark how important the literal, rather than emotional truth is. Clark and Chloe, and Lex and Lana, are on two sides of a moral dialog that underwrites the series.

Hmm. More ramble later.
schmevil: (Default)
Swear to god there’s some interesting stuff in there, but if you don’t want to go through it all, scroll past the cut.

Jenn and MHC on muses, SV fandom, Themes, ourselves and leprechauns )

This got me thinking. Eventually I came up with the below:

MHC’s Fic Philosophy


Carry nothing from one fic to the next, except for lessons about yourself.

Approach canon, and your characters freshly, every time you attempt to interpret them.

Be able to accept change in canon and your reactions to canon.

Always write what is logical, fascinating, challenging and fun. This does not preclude the unlikely. Alternate universes are beautiful things.

Never write something you don’t feel. If your emotions aren’t engaged, neither will your readers’ be.

You will internalize some things from other fic – style, characterization, ideas – treat these notions harshly, but if they bear up to scrutiny, let them be as your own.

Write for yourself, write for others, write for your dead dog, but write only because you want to.

Be prepared to do what the story requires and not necessarily what you’d like. But if you really want it and you can do it well, do whatever the hell you like.

A cliché is only cliché if handled poorly. Otherwise it's an interesting way to twist expectations or make a common point.

Never be afraid of yourself, but doubt yourself occasionally. Never rest on your laurels.

Accept criticism, no matter the content or source, but ignore the flamers and trolls. They are beneath you.

Always respond to feedback. Even the idiots might one day have something to tell you about your stories.
schmevil: (Default)
In my defense, I was on no sleep.

TA: So you write?

MHC: Ah... a little poetry, which isn't terribly good and some derivativefiction. Um.

TA: Oh! Really? What kind of derivative fiction?

MHC: Er... well, at the moment I'm attempting a reworking of the Superman story reconciling several 'subtextual readings' of the various texts, including religious and queer interpretations. I'm interested in looking at will to power in a patriarchal context, as it relates to the ideologically opposed characters Lex Luthor and Clark Kent, and how such religious and queer readings can expose the similarities in their positions, and explode the myth of the hero and villain. Particularly the plurality of the hero (Clark Kent, Superman and Kal El) is an interesting contrast to Lex Luthor's unified persona. Witness how in Smallville, this becomes problematic for the hero's position as arbitrary- *MHC looks around* Um...

TA: Right.

Class: ...

TA: So, Jane. You said that you write as well?

Jane: Yes. I'm currently working on my first screenplay. It's a kind of dark, romantic comedy with, like, references to the work of physical comedians such as Chaplin and Carey.

MHC: ...

Yes. This did happen. Yes. I did use air quotes.

No. I didn't make much sense.

GIP!

Sep. 5th, 2003 09:15 pm
schmevil: (Default)
You know, I'm really tired of the suggestion that Lex will turn eeevil because of lack of love, or because people punked him off. Neither of these excuse a blood shower. Also, they simplify the character to an alarming degree, making him little more than a stupid, hormonal boy (woobie! woobie! woobie!). [livejournal.com profile] emelerin and I had a long conversation about this. Clark may be able to save him from MMs and occasionally his Luthorness, but he's ineffective against the greater danger.
schmevil: (Default)
In preparation of the new season of Smallville, I have acquired two new icons. Yes, my dirty 'secret' is that Lex and Lana are the characters on the show I'd most like to throw to the ground and ravish. Woe.





SV isn't a great show. Objectively, I can say with confidence that the writing is poor, the acting mediocre and the special effects uninspired. My subjective opinion of the show is a different matter entirely.

I love that it's stupid and corny and that the actors are all very, very pretty. It's like a super-saccharine candy that assaults you with its sugary goodness and then quickly fades away, leaving a slightly bitter, slightly sour aftertaste. You can't help but tonguing your teeth, trying to uncover another layer of flavour.

It's fun and always passionate about itself, which I can't fault and it leaves me wondering about it afterward, despite that it shouldn't be able to. I like that I can rant about The Dumb, but still enjoy watching it. I like that there are things for me to rant about.

While I sometimes hate the direction of the story arcs, I stick around, because it's always going to be a fascinating ride. Your passions are supposed to frustrate you and Smallville does just that for the majority of its fans. It's very good at giving no one exactly what they want and everyone exactly what they didn't, but the subtext and the potential of it, keep us around. We're learning to be satisfied with what we can have and always wary about the things we want. Do we want the right things? Is it possible to have them? Will we even want them, once we've got them?

It's fun.

[/fangirl]

Drabble

Aug. 31st, 2003 05:06 am
schmevil: (Default)
Title: Oral Fixation
Fandom: Smallville


*lick* )
schmevil: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] _nepthys_ linked to some Clark pics and the page had a link to spoilers. I couldn't resist, for two reasons, really.

1) I know it's going to fall somewhere from mediocre to vomitous, so 'anticipatory' isn't the first word I'd use for my feelings about the ep. I really enjoy the show, don't get me wrong, but there's no way they're going to sell me on this plot arc. No way in even the frostiest of hells.

2) The writers are so creatively retarded that one can usually predict the outcome of a given plot twist. Their idea of suspense is laughable and their plot threads either so paint-by-numbers, or so garbled that I sometimes entertain the idea that Marti Noxon has been moonlighting on the crew.

My reaction to the spoilers can be summed up with one word:

not really a spoiler but could be for those who know me well or read this journal closely )

That is all.

*yawn*

Aug. 22nd, 2003 07:53 am
schmevil: (Default)
I have removed a little over 30 journals from my flist in the last week and I'm still looking to cut more. I'm sure I'll read those journals again at some point, but right now I'm swamped and don't want to feel obliged to keep up with quite so many people. Needless to say, it's becoming much more manageable. Last night [livejournal.com profile] seperis and I were talking about filters and she suggested I set some up to read my flist more easily. I've tried filters more than a few times and I've never been able to make them work to my satisfaction. I find myself reading communities at their sites and never looking at the smaller filters. Eventually I always end up back on the default, unfiltered flist.

I'm really pleased with how [livejournal.com profile] badficsupport and [livejournal.com profile] potterversechat have turned out, but I don't think I've been putting enough work into promoting [livejournal.com profile] the_lioness, or that other community. If you know what I'm talking about, you're a member. If you don't then it doesn't matter. Look to see challenges and membership drives in each of the latter. [livejournal.com profile] tstar78 and I have long be searching for ways to increase the traffic at [livejournal.com profile] the_lioness and we've been playing with the idea of drabble challenges, since they're less of an intellectual investment than full length fics. I really do enjoy talking about Lillian Luthor, so increased traffic would make me very happy. BTW, check out the chat transcript that [livejournal.com profile] adolfa kindly posted in [livejournal.com profile] potterversechat for me. This week's topic was Minerva. Members remember that Minerva is now an open topic for the community.

This weekend I will be writing (and hopefully betaing) intensively, so if there's something you need, ask me today. I have 2 fics due and of course, 1 overdue, as well as that long promised birthday fic for [livejournal.com profile] celli. I'm toying with the idea of a silly Plionel drabble for [livejournal.com profile] thamaris. *g* How can anyone resist silly Petefic? If they can, I don't want to know about it. I think PoTC is going to be rewatched at some point...
schmevil: (Default)
So [livejournal.com profile] emelerin said "Talk about Clex, break my heart." How could I resist? Someone who actually dislikes the pairing would probably do a better job, but I'm giving it the ole college try.

In the context of Smallville Clex is my favourite pairing, however, in all other Superman incarnations I'm all for Clark/Lois or Lex/Lois, or Lois/Selena, or Lois/Diana - you get the idea. This is the only incarnation in which Clark and Lex seem to share a destiny. While other canon might suggest that they have a connection, it has never been so deep as it is on Smallville. It's an easy jump from destiny to Destined Love (followed by Destined Hate), especially considering the visual subtext on the show. The thing is, Clex really isn't analogous to Romeo and Juliet's star-crossed love and the two characters really aren't that compatible. Don't get me wrong, I love the pairing and have a lot of fun writing it but I to keep in mind that Clark and Lex are bad for each other.

Canonically, Clark and Lex are very rarely shown enjoying each other's company for the sake of company. One might argue that the limitations of the tv format preclude this but we do see buddy scenes on other shows. Most times Clark and Lex are interacting on screen, there is a secondary (and sometimes even tertiary, oh my!) agenda at work. Clark wants money from Lex. Lex want's information from Clark. How many times have they just chilled in the study playing pool? Thinking hard? Me too. Their relationship is based on mutual need and desire, not on compatibility. Each of them is socially dysfunctional and at times it seems it is the idea of each other and their friendship that is more attractive than the reality.

I said that I don't think these two are actually all that compatible and here's why:

1. They don't get along. Ok, this seems so obvious as to be retarded. You may argue that the conflict we see in the relationship is temporary, caused by extreme stresses but Clark and Lex have never, from the beginning of the series, been able to just be together.

2. They don't understand each other. At all. Clark and Lex each have extremely rigid ideas of the other but neither is correct in his assumptions. Look at their history of misunderstandings and arguments - has either of them really moved closer to understanding and accepting the other? I would argue that they understand each other just enough to really screw up.

3. They don't even like each other! No, I'm serious. See #2. Clark and Lex want to change each other. They expect more of each other. They push each other. They don't for a moment allow the other to be who he actually is. They're like little boys, frustrated with a favourite toy. Why can't it work like this? I suspect that each would be happier with someone else with a best friend but they're both limited in what toys they get to play with.

4. Their expectations and desires are wildly divergent. Lex wants a family's total acceptance, as well as total freedom. Clark just wants to be normal. While they might seem to match superficially, the two goals are so functionally different that there are bound to be problems. (Duh).

5. Clark is too young for Lex. Seriously. There's a reason Lex is seen with women his age and much older. Lex is very much an adult, though with the idiosyncrasies of a younger man. In this sense he is typical of men who've grown up quickly and lost their childhood in the process. Clark, well. Clark is a teenager and I'm not sure there's any way of arguing that he doesn't behave like one.

Ok, so Clark and Lex are pretty incompatible on a fundamental level. We already knew this, though. Most Clex stories have an undercurrent of impending DOOM because we all know it's coming canonically and the inbuilt tensions in the relationship ensure that the DOOM will never really go away. It's always going to be in the background.

The whole basis for the pairing is a friendship that isn't! Fellow Clexers, lay down your quills and keyboards for we write nonsense! Nonsense, I say.

But seriously. Does Clex really boil down to tired enemies slash? I could list all the reasons I'm fascinated by the pairing and why in the context of Smallville I think it will always be more dynamic than any het pairings, but I'd rather hear your thoughts.

Sorry Em, I just ran out of steam there. *g* I'll break your heart tomorrow when I have better arguments.

July 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags